Analysis of comfort and convenience factors in improved restraint systems.

Author(s)
Gordon, S. Kondo, A. & Breedon, D.
Year
Abstract

Six occupant restraint systems (both current production and prototype) were evaluated in terms of comfort and convenience by 30 subjects. Questions were asked concerning particular problem areas as well as overall system comparisons. A new paired comparison statistical procedure was developed that considers each subject as an independent control factor and, therefore, eliminated personal bias. The modified Seville was significantly better than the other systems. The modified Volare, standard Volare, and Impala rated in the upper to middle category. The Rabbit and Chevette ranked as the worst systems tested. Smoothness, repeatability, and comfortable tension in the shoulder belt retractor appeared to be the most important factors influencing comfort and convenience.

Request publication

3 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
B 13566 /91.1 /
Source

Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Transportation DOT, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NHTSA, 1976, 65 p., ref.; DOT HS 802 113

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.