Road safety is handicapped by the terminology used. Words have the power to convey impressions as well as meanings, starting with the concept of 'road safety' itself. The words 'road safety' have been understood to apply to activities that properly belong to roads, and by extension, to road authorities. By implication this has reduced the role of activities in a number of different areas, in spite of their potentially significant contributions. The author believes it is better to go for a systems approach which would permit road safety to be viewed as an area where the situation can be improved thanks to a fully developed management system which implements the correct conceptual approach and allows policies and programmes to evolve in order to reduce casualties and damage to property. Examples are provided to illustrate why it is better to go for a systems approach. The author looks at differences between analytical and systems methodology; the design of the control system; qualitative targets; and the benefits of utilising systems methodology. Tables illustrate the definition of a road safety management system and qualitative targets.
Abstract