An analysis of risks posed by SUVs compared to certain other common vehicles looks at driver death rates in crashes involving specific types of vehicles built between 1995 and 1999. The "combined risk" of each vehicle type is measured, which is the sum of the risk that drivers of the vehicles face and the risk that drivers of other vehicles face when they crash into them. This includes factors beyond vehicle design, such as the type of driving and driver behavior. Minivans offer the lowest risk, perhaps because they are built on car platforms and because their drivers may exercise more care because they are often used to transport children. However, there is no direct link between a vehicle's weight or size and the risk it poses. Some of the safest small cars pose less risk than some SUVs. The findings suggest that requiring vehicles to meet stricter fuel standards does not necessarily mean they will be more dangerous in crashes.
Abstract