AXIAL CAPACITY OF VIBRATORY-DRIVEN PILES VERSUS IMPACT-DRIVEN PILES

Author(s)
MOSHER, RL
Abstract

In recent years, vibratory pile drivers have gained popularity with contractors due to the increased productivity that can be realized with their use. The driving time can be reduced by a factor of 10to 20 over that of an impact-driven pile. This gain in productivityis very attractive and profitable, but questions exist as to whether vibratory driving has an effect on a pile's axial capacity when compared with an impact-driven pile. This paper presents and discussesthe results of a study of three pile testing programs that make direct coparison between vibratory- and impact-driven piles. One of these testing programs has never before been reported in the literature. From the study of these testing programs, it was found that the vibratory-driven piles had a significant reduction in axial capacity when compared with the impact-driven piles. This reduction in capacity of the vibratory-driven piles was due to a lower tip resistance. This paper appears in transportation research record no. 1277, Modern geotechnical methods: instrumentation and vibratory hammers 1990.

Request publication

4 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
I 842052 IRRD 9108
Source

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD WASHINGTON D.C. USA 0361-1981 SERIAL 1990-01-01 1277J128-135 T9

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.