Social information use is common in a wide range of group-living animals, notably in humans. The authors investigated social information use by pedestrians in a potentially dangerous scenario: at a road crossing. To judge a safe gap in traffic, pedestrians can use social information, such as the crossing behaviour of others, and follow others across the road. The authors tested if pedestrians followed others in this scenario by analysing pedestrian starting position and crossing order. First, they found that neighbours of a crossing pedestrian tended to cross before other waiting pedestrians and that this tendency was significantly higher in observed pedestrians than in a null model: a simulation in which pedestrians did not follow each other. Also, by fitting the null model, it was found that on average a person was 1.5-2.5 times more likely to cross if their neighbour had started to cross. Second, it was found that males tended to follow others more than females. Third, it was observed that some individuals started to cross and then returned to the roadside. These individuals were more frequently found in groups and tended to start to cross relatively later than other pedestrians. These observations suggest that some of these individuals made incorrect decisions about the timing of their crossing and that this was due to social information use. Finally, the authors propose that the relatively small benefit of a reduced waiting time came at the cost of an increased risk of injury, making the beneficial value of social information use questionable in this context. (Author/publisher)
Abstract