Comments on Wells-Parker et al.'s article `Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders' (see ST 952064 fo).

Author(s)
Mann, R.E. Peck, R.C. McKnight, A.J. Hedlund, J. Assailly, J.P. Nickel, W.-R. Wells-Parker, E.N. Bangert-Drowns, R. & Williams, M.
Year
Abstract

This paper contains the following comments: Settling old questions : stimulating new ones (R.E. Mann); Inherent problems with meta-analysis (R.C. Peck); Meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders : a useful clarification of what is and is not known (A.J. McKnight); Meta-analysis helps to define the policy-relevance of drink driving research (J. Hedlund); Remediation can only give what it has, so do not ask too much (J.P. Assailly); The need to standardize methodology (W.-R. Nickel); The past is prologue : determining directions for research on DUI remediation from meta-analysis (E. Wells-Parker, R. Bangert-Drowns, and M. Williams)

Publication

Library number
960397 ST [electronic version only]
Source

Addiction, Vol. 90 (1995), No. 12 (December), p. 1587-1601, 16 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.