Comparative analyses of three types of headway control systems for heavy commercial vehicles. Paper presented at the 14th International Association for Vehicle System Dynamics IAVSD symposium on the dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks, Ann Arbor...

Author(s)
Fancher, P.S. Peng, H. & Bareket, Z.
Year
Abstract

This paper compares design approaches for achieving a headway control functionality for trucks and buses. The approaches considered are fuzzy logic, H-Infinity, and a strategy based on headway range and its derivative (range-rate). For heavy vehicles, the control unit has a number of nonlinearities to compensate for, including full accelerator saturation, engine characteristics, and a limited deceleration capability as may be influenced by rolling resistance, aerodynamic drag, and retarder capabilities. Performance properties of the controllers are derived from simulations of basic operational situations such as closing-in on a preceding vehicle that is traveling at a slower speed or following a vehicle whose speed varies. (A)

Request publication

1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
962665 g ST (In: ST 962665) /91 /
Source

In: Recent publications related to Autonomous Intelligent Cruise Control AICC research at the University of Michigan, 1996, 13 p., 9 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.