Comparative analysis of crash sensors.

Author(s)
Jones, T.O. O.T. McCarter & R.N. Oglesby
Year
Abstract

Techniques and principles for evaluating and comparing various crash sensor concepts are discussed. The trade-off criteria include: crash /rough-road discrimination, target lethality, component reliability, zone of protection, environmental susceptibility, and other criteria. Within the context of hardware performance characteristics, currently prominent devices are described including: inertial mass, spring mass, piezoelectric and piezoresistive accelerometers, radar, sonar, and laser predictive sensors and bumper mounted detectors. An example of the assessment method is presented, comparing an inertial mass and a spring mass detector.

Request publication

1 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
B 766 fo /91.2
Source

New York, SAE, 1971. 30 cm., 28 blz., grafn., 12 ref., tabn., tekn. Presented at the Automotive Engineering Congress, Detroit, Mich., January 10-14, 1972 SAE publ. 720035

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.