Comparison between the three- point belt and the air cushion evaluation and discussion of their cost- efficiency ratio.

Author(s)
Chillon, C. Brutel, G. Mauron, G. et.al.
Year
Abstract

Based on a detailed examination of accidents, the author compares the measured efficiency of the three- point seatbelt with that for a case- by- case evaluation of the air cushion; the result obtained is discussed, firstly as a function of the accidental or technical parameters which govern it and of the perspectives on the wearing of the seatbelt; then taking economic factors into account, as a function of the cost efficiency ratio of these two devices.

Request publication

13 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
B 30510 (In: B 30451 [electronic version only]) /80 /91 / IRRD 830248
Source

In: 11th International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles ESV, Washington, D.C., May 12-15, 1987, p. 511-523, 8 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.