A comparison of embedded and conventional retaining wall design using Eurocode 7 and existing UK design methods. Prepared for the Highways Agency, Quality Services (Civil Engineering).

Author(s)
Carder, D.R.
Year
Abstract

This report gives the results from comparative studies on the design of embedded and conventional retaining walls using Eurocode 7 and existing UK design methods. Design examples for embedded walls included both cantilever and walls propped at the top: L-shaped walls and bridge abutments were considered for conventional construction. Retained heights of the structures were typical of those used on the national motorway network. Sizing of the structures was carried out by considering the different ultimate limit state modes of failure and design of the structural elements was then established for serviceability and ultimate limit states. The overall designs using the various standards/codes were then compared to assess their relative merits. (A)

Publication

Library number
C 9739 [electronic version only] /24 / IRRD 895799
Source

Crowthorne, Berkshire, Transport Research Laboratory TRL, 1998, IV + 22 p., 18 ref.; TRL Report ; No. 320 - ISSN 0968-4107

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.