COMPARISON OF METHODS AND EQUIPMENT TO CONDUCT PAVEMENT DISTRESSSURVEYS

Author(s)
BENSON, KR ELKINS, GE UDDIN, W HUDSON, WR
Abstract

Selected distress survey methods and equipment, representing a range in automation, were tested and evaluated. The following methodsand devices were included in the testing: manual mapping; detailed visual surveys using manual recording and automatic data logging; and the pasco roadrecon, groupe examen routier photographic (gerpho), automatic road analyzer (aran), and laser road surface tester (rst) high-speed surve vehicles. Field tests were conducted on flexible, rigid, and composite pavements exhibiting a range of pavement distresses. The distress survey methods and equipment were evaluated basedon their performance and capabilities in the field. The study concludes that, at present, the gerpho and pasco roadrecon can be used for both network level and project level distress surveys and are wellsuited for pavement research studies. The aran and laser rst are recommended for consideration in network-level surveys. It is also recommended that automatic data loggers be used when manual distress surveys are conducted. This paper appears in transportation research record no. 1196, Pavement evaluation and rehabilitation.

Request publication

10 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
I 829168 IRRD 9005
Source

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD WASHINGTON D.C. USA 0361-1981 SERIAL 1988-01-01 1196 PAG:40-50 T11

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.