Current and future Australian practices for the design of unsignalized intersections.

Author(s)
Troutbeck, R.J.
Year
Abstract

This paper discusses the gap acceptance methods of evaluating the capacity of unsignalised intersections, including roundabouts, which are described in the Australian State Road Authorities' two intersection design guides. It compares these methods with those in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual; most of the mathematical techniques used have been based on Tanner's results. It assesses some recent Australian researches on traffic on unsignalised intersections, which cover the following aspects: (1) gap acceptance parameters and the distribution of accepted and rejected gaps; (2) absorption capacity for two levels of priority; (3) absorption capacity for three levels of priority; (4) average values for the delay before a vehicle can cross an intersection; (5) crossing with shared priority. Finally, there is a discussion of possible future Australian research on unsignalised intersections; more work is needed on gap acceptance parameters and on flow and headway distributions along road links, under Australian road traffic conditions.

Request publication

1 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
C 617 (In: C 616) /71 /21 / IRRD 819798
Source

In: Intersections without traffic signals : proceedings of an international workshop, Bochum, West Germany, March 16-18, 1988, p. 1-19, 27 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.