Design guide for addressing nonreccurent congestion. SHRP 2 Reliability Project L07, prepublication draft, not edited.

Author(s)
Potts, I.B. Harwood, D.W. Fees, C.A. Hutton, J.M. & Kenzel, C.
Year
Abstract

The purpose of this guide is to provide traffic engineers, highway designers, transportation planners, and decision-makers with a catalogue of highway design treatments that can be used to reduce non-recurrent congestion and improve the reliability of urban and rural freeways. Non-recurrent congestion is congestion outside of what is normally expected during daily traffic peaks. It can be caused by crashes, non-crash incidents, special events, weather, work zones, demand surges, or traffic control devices. Roadways that experience several of these events often have low reliability, because the drivers who use the facility have difficulty accurately estimating the amount of time their trip will take. The concepts of non-recurrent congestion and reliability are discussed in Chapter 1 of this guide. While many agencies are familiar with the potential benefits of deploying real-time traveller information systems and roadside assist programs to reduce the impacts of incidents, special events, and inclement weather, little consideration has been given to how the design of the roadway and roadside can also play an important role in mitigating the congestion caused by these events. This guide considers the impact of both standard features, such as the provision of full-depth shoulders, and innovative features, such as queue jump lanes, and explores the benefits they may be able to provide during non-recurrent congestion. Some treatments are used primarily to address non-recurrent congestion, while others may be implemented for another reason, such as increased capacity during periods of nonrecurring congestion, but may have additional benefits during non-recurrent congestion events. The full range of treatments included in this guide is presented in Chapter 2. Chapter 2 also provides a process for narrowing the full list of treatments to those that may provide the most benefit in various situations. A decision tree is presented that walks the reader through the process of considering the main cause of non-recurrent congestion and the means by which that non-recurrent congestion might be mitigated. Ideally, the reader will leave Chapter 2 with a handful of treatments that will be investigated further as candidates for possible implementation. Chapter 3 of this guide serves as a catalogue of the treatments and provides a range of information on each one, including: • Description and primary objective of the treatment • Typical applications of the treatment • Design criteria or guidelines if available in design manuals or from research • How the treatment can be used to address non-recurrent congestion • Factors that affect the treatment’s effectiveness • Cost considerations • Resources for additional information. The reader may choose to browse through this catalogue to learn more about several treatments, or may specifically go to the descriptions of the treatments identified in Chapter 3 as potential candidates for implementation. While Chapter 3 provides information on how each treatment can be used to reduce non-recurrent congestion and the factors that may make it more or less successful in doing so, it does not provide guidance on quantifying the benefit of the treatment in terms of non-recurrent congestion reduced or reliability improved. However, these benefits are real, and can be monetised to allow for a benefit-cost calculation to be performed. To assist the reader in carrying the treatments identified in this guide through the next step of consideration for implementation, an analysis tool has been developed as a sister product to this guide. The tool allows the user to compare the benefit-cost ratio of several treatments, providing valuable information to design decision-makers. In addition to the analysis tool, the final report documenting the research project that developed these products provides detailed information on the principles and calculations that drive the analysis tool. The products are available on SHRP 2’s website. Finally, Chapter 4 of this guide provides information about existing installations of several of the treatments included here, allowing the reader to identify agencies that have experience with various treatments and that may be able to provide insight and guidance to other agencies considering the treatment. This guide can be used as a resource during all stages of the design process, but will perhaps be the most beneficial prior to or during early project planning phases. While some of the treatments presented in this guide can be easily retrofitted into existing facilities, others will be most cost-effective when incorporated into a planned construction or maintenance project. In addition, some treatments are most effective at reducing non-recurrent congestion when incorporated with specific geometric or operational elements, and coordination of all aspects of the project in the early phases can help maximize benefits. Once potential treatments are identified, and their benefits to non-recurrent congestion understood, the analysis tool can be used to quantify those benefits. A benefit-cost analysis that captures delay reduction and reliability benefits can help justify the implementation of treatments that may otherwise have not been considered for a project. (Author/publisher)

Publication

Library number
20131738 ST [electronic version only]
Source

Washington, D.C., Transportation Research Board TRB, 2013, VIII + 213 p.; The Second Strategic Highway Research Program SHRP 2 ; SHRP 2 Reliability Project L07

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.