Disposition of cannabinoids in oral fluid after controlled around-the-clock oral THC administration.

Author(s)
Milman, G. Barnes, A.J. Schwope, D.M. Schwilke, E.W. Darwin, W.D. Goodwin, R.S. Kelly, D.L. Gorelick, D.A. & Huestis, M.A.
Year
Abstract

Oral fluid, a promising alternative matrix for drug monitoring in clinical and forensic investigations, offers noninvasive sample collection under direct observation. Cannabinoid distribution into oral fluid is complex and incompletely characterized due to the lack of controlled drug administration studies. To characterize cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid, the authors administered around-the-clock oral Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (Marinol) doses to 10 participants with current daily cannabis use. They obtained oral fluid samples (n=440) by use of Quantisal collection devices before, during, and after 37 20-mg THC doses over 9 days. Samples were extracted with multiple elution solvents from a single SPE column and analyzed by 2-dimensional GC-MS with electron-impact ionization for THC, 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC), cannabidiol, and cannabinol and negative chemical ionization for 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH). Linear ranges were 0.5-50 microg/L, with the exception of cannabinol (1-50 microg/L) and THCCOOH (7.5-500 ng/L). THCCOOH was the most prevalent analyte in 432 samples (98.2%), with concentrations up to 1117.9 ng/L. In contrast, 11-OH-THC was not identified in any sample; cannabidiol and cannabinol were quantified in 3 and 8 samples, respectively, with maximum concentrations of 2.1 and 13 microg/L. THC was present in only 20.7% of samples, with highest concentrations near admission (median 4.2 microg/L, range 0.6-481.9) from previously self-administered smoked cannabis. It is concluded that measurement of THCCOOH in OF not only identifies cannabis exposure, but also minimizes the possibility of passive inhalation. THCCOOH may be a better analyte for detection of cannabis use. (Author/publisher)

Publication

Library number
20111758 ST [electronic version only]
Source

Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 56 (2010), No. 8 (August), p. 1261-1269, 33 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.