This investigation of drinking and driving explored american attitudes, beliefs, legal knowledge and self-reported violations through national surveys in 1983 (1, 000 drivers) and 1986 (1, 800 drivers).The findings from 1986 replicated all of the basic drinking-drivingcontrol tactics reported in 1983, and there were modest gains in compliance rates over time. There was a decrease in perceived certainty of arrests, but in view of the compliance gains, this decrease seems to have compensated by increases in legal knowledge, credibility of sanctions and personal support for drunk-driving controls. While there was support for some element of simple deterrence theory, the findings are more fully accommodated by the inculcation process implied in general deterrence theory.
Abstract