Recumbent bicycles are generally more comfortable, more efficient and safer than conventional bikes, as argued in the first part of this article (Daams, 1999, see ST 991563 fo). Still, the usefulness of a recumbent depends very much on the purpose for which it is used. In this second part, the usefulness for various applications is assessed. The conclusion is that recumbents are most advantageous on long distance rides (for commuting and cycling tours) and in races. Furthermore, recumbents are ideal for cyclists with certain physical problems, like back pain, saddle pain and pain in wrist and arm. The question is addressed why recumbents are not more popular. This may have a number of reasons, mainly concerning unfamiliarity with recumbents, the image of the bicycle, the attitude of other people, and the price. In the Netherlands, recumbents are growing more popular and less expensive, and it is expected that this will continue over the next years. (A)
Abstract