Motorists typically select routes that minimize their travel time or generalized cost. This may entail traveling on longer but faster routes. This raises questions concerning whether traveling along a longer but faster route results in energy and/or air quality improvements. We investigate the impacts of route choice decisions on vehicle energy consumption and emission rates for different vehicle types using microscopic and macroscopic emission estimation tools. The results demonstrate that the faster highway route choice is not always the best from an environmental and energy consumption perspective. Specifically, significant improvements to energy and air quality can be achieved when motorists utilize a slower arterial route although they incur additional travel time. The study also demonstrates that macroscopic emission estimation tools (e.g., MOBILE6) can produce erroneous conclusions given that they ignore transient vehicle behavior along a route. The findings suggest that an emission- and energy-optimized traffic assignment can significantly improve emissions over the standard user equilibrium and system optimum assignment formulations. Finally, the study demonstrates that a small portion of the entire trip involves high engine-load conditions that produce significant increases in emissions; demonstrating that by minimizing high-emitting driving behavior, air quality can be improved significantly. (A) Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
Abstract