Evaluation of operational efficiencies, cost, and accident experience of four phase single point urban interchanges.

Author(s)
Lee, J.C. Bonneson, J.A. Kidd, B.D. & Larwin Jr., T.F.
Year
Abstract

This research compares two interchange types, the Tight Urban Diamond Interchange (TUDI) and the Four Phase Single Point Urban Interchange (40SPUI). The 40SPUI is referred to in this report as a Single Point Urban Interchange with Frontage Roads (SPUI/F). The objectives of this research were to: (1) evaluate the SPUI/F based on available accident data and conflict analysis techniques, right-of-way and construction costs, and operating efficiency; (2) compare the performance of the SPUI/F and the TUDI; (3) evaluate current SPUI/F design assumptions and operation and recommend design and/or operational changes to enhance performance; and (4) evaluate the interchange form selection (pre-design) process and recommend changes where appropriate. The research found no significant difference in the safety aspects of the two interchange types. The SPUI/F generally did not perform as well operationally as the TUDI, with increased SPUI/F delay as the distance between frontage roads increased.

Request publication

2 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
C 32266 [electronic version only] /20 / ITRD E825998
Source

Phoenix, AZ, Arizona Department of Transportation, 2002, 200 p., 45 ref.; FHWA-AZ01-501

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.