Evidence-based road safety policy? : evidence-based transport policy? : a discussion of randomised experimentation and meta-analysis in the evaluation of interventions.

Author(s)
Hutchinson, T.P. & Meier, A.J.
Year
Abstract

This paper discusses methods of evaluating interventions. Examples in the transport field include improving compliance with speed limits, or boosting the use of public transport. In recent years there has been a push towards higher methodological standards in medical research, because of the biases that can easily creep into comparisons that are of central interest in a research project. Particular features of this trend are in the conduct of research, randomised allocation of the experimental units to treatment or control groups, and in synthesis of previous research, carrying out what is termed a meta-analysis rather than a review in narrative style, with the analysis giving much greater weight to studies that had good methodology than to those which did not. The phrase ‘evidence-based’ is used in this paper to refer to these features, not to a general hope that research and facts will influence policy. This paper documents the extent to which high methodological standards have been adopted in transport and transport safety to date, and attempts to assess what place they might have in future. (Author/publisher) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E211825.

Request publication

7 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
C 34180 (In: C 34141 CD-ROM) /72 /10 / ITRD E211864
Source

In: ATRF 04: papers of the 27th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Volume 27, University of South Australia, Transport Systems Centre, 29 September-1 October 2004, 21 p., ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.