THE IDENTIFICATION OF MISTAKES IN ROAD ACCIDENT RECORDS: PART 1, LOCATIONAL VARIABLES.

Author(s)
AUSTIN-K (INST FOR TRANSP STUDIES, LEEDS UNIV, UK)
Year
Abstract

The current method of checking police-reported road accident data involves a rigorous process of manual and computer validation, with the objective of removing all the errors that exist on the accident report forms. This paper shows how a geographic information system (GIS) can be used to identify mistakes that exist in several locational variables once this process has been undertaken. It compares items contained on the accident report form with accurate highway feature information obtained from other sources. There were less than 10% of mistakes for the variables of district, speed limit, road class, and road number; less than 20% for junction control, junction detail, and pedestrian crossing facilities; and over 20% for carriageway type. If highway data were routinely entered onto a GIS by all British highway authorities, the above variables might not need to be entered by the police on their accident report forms. (A) For Part 2 of this paper see IRRD 86)

Request publication

7 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
I 869836 IRRD 9504
Source

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION. 1995 /04. 27(2) pp261-76 (10 Refs.) ELSEVIER SCIENCE LIMITED, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, OXFORD, OX5 1GB, UNITED KINGDOM 1995 0001-4575

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.