Identifying accessibility problems and appropriate solutions for socially disadvantaged groups.

Author(s)
Jones, P.
Year
Abstract

Existing accessibility tools, such as Accession in the UK, focus mainly on the spatial dimension of disadvantage, by identifying groups that have to travel for excessive periods of time to reach a given service or facility. There is less understanding of the other kinds of constraint that poorer people without access to a car may face, including fear of travel, costsand timing constraints. The first part of this study describes the use ofqualitative methods and the development of various stimulus materials, used to encourage local residents to identify and articulate the kinds of accessibility problems they faced in their everyday lives. Among other things, this identified problems arising from gaps in responsibilities between agencies leaving people without services. Many of the key results of this exercise were subsequently embodied in a spreadsheet, where typical timingand other constraints experienced by different groups have been codified.As a further development of this work, a second tool was developed to help agencies identify the potential wider knock-on effects, on the areas of responsibility of other agencies and ultimately the wider public, of decisions that they might take that serve their own interests. For example, theamalgamation of two schools might be intended to increase the quality of education, but might lead to less sustainable travel patterns, reductions in physical exercise and increases in anti-social behaviour. The second part of the paper describes a series of methods that were developed to encourage the generation of more open, innovative and 'joined-up' solutions to the various problems identified in the first part of the paper. These wereapplied both among groups of residents and groups of professionals representing agencies with an involvement in service provision. These include role playing, gap analysis and brainstorming. From this work two spreadsheettools have been developed, one of which suggests known solutions to particular kinds of problems, while the other seeks to stimulate 'outside the box' thinking by presenting people with random sets of pictures that are designed to encourage new thought patterns. For the covering abstract see ITRD E145999

Request publication

5 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
C 49406 (In: C 49291 [electronic version only]) /72 / ITRD E146117
Source

In: Proceedings of the European Transport Conference ETC, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands, 6-8 October 2008, 17 p.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.