Intermodaal railvervoer geen kosteneffectieve maatregel ? : een analyse met behulp van reduktiekosten.

Author(s)
Dings, J.M.W. & Roos, J.H.J.
Year
Abstract

By means of a case study for maritime container transport on distances betweeen 100 and 1000 km, this paper shows that intermodal rail transport is not a cost effective environmental measure, contrary to intermodal transport by inland vessel. This is caused by the high price of railroad infrastructure that can not be calculated in transport prices, as the intermodal product quality is too low. The society pays the deficit; the costs are high compared to the environmental benefits of intermodal transport. In order to change this situation, intermodal rail transport speed should be kept at 80 kmh, its product quality should increase, and the existing rail infrastructure should be better utilized. Furthermore, nitrous oxides better utilized. Furthermore, nitrous oxides (NOx) emissions from marine diesel engines should decrease, otherwise intermodal transport by inland vessel will be not cleaner in 2010, compared to the competing road trucks. (A)

Request publication

8 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
C 4104 (In: C 4075 [electronic version only]) /15 /72 / IRRD 876666
Source

In: Colloquium Vervoersplanologisch Speurwerk CVS 1995 : decentralisatie van beleid : implicaties voor kennis en onderzoek : bundeling van bijdragen aan het colloquium gehouden te Rotterdam op 23 en 24 november 1995, Deel 2, p. 521-539, 8 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.