Knowledge of drink-driving penalties, perceptions of sanction severity and deterrence.

Author(s)
Briscoe, S.
Year
Abstract

This paper draws upon a case study of an increase in statutory penalties for drink-driving offences in order to examine the contribution of legal knowledge to perceptions of punishment severity and decisions to drink and drive. In 1998, the NSW State Government doubled the penalties for almost all drink-driving offences with the aim to deter offending and improve road safety. An interrupted time-series analysis, examining the impact of this legislation, found no evidence for a reduction in alcohol-related road accidents after the legislation was enacted (Briscoe 2004a), despite a significant increase in the average penalties drink-drivers received (Briscoe 2004b). Utilising a scenario-based survey methodology, this study investigates whether people who have more accurate knowledge of the sanctions currently applicable to drink-driving offences in NSW, perceive drink driving penalties to be more severe and state that they are less likely to offend compared to those who have little or poor knowledge of the law. (Author/publisher) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E211985.

Request publication

9 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
C 34815 (In: C 34795 [electronic version only]) /83 /73 / ITRD E212037
Source

In: Proceedings of the 2004 Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Perth, Western Australia, 14-16 November 2004, Volume 2 [Print] 12 p., 17 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.