MONITORING AN AUTOMATED SYSTEM FOR A SINGLE FAILURE: VIGILANCE AND TASK COMPLEXITY EFFECTS.

Author(s)
Molloy, R. & Parasuraman, R.
Year
Abstract

The present study examined the effects of task complexity and time on task on the monitoring of a single automation failure during performance of a complex flight simulation task involving tracking, fuel management, and engine-status monitoring. Two groups of participants performed either all three flight simulation tasks simultaneously or the monitoring task alone; a third group performed a simple visual vigilance task. For the multicomplex task, monitoring for a single failure of automation control was poorer than when participants monitored engine malfunctions under manual control. Also, more participants detected the automation failure in the first 10 minutes of a 30-minute session than in the last 10 minutes of the session, for both the simple and the multicomplex task. Participants in the single-complex condition detected the automation failure equally well in both periods. The results support previous findings of inefficiency in monitoring automation and show that automation-related monitoring inefficiency occurs even when there is a single automation failure. Implications for theories of vigilance and automation design are discussed.

Request publication

1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
TRIS 00730796
Source

Human Factors. 1996 /06. 38(2) Pp311-322 (4 Fig., 2 Tab., 34 Ref.)

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.