More positive or more extreme ? : a meta-analysis of mode differences in response choice.

Author(s)
Ye, C. Fulton, J. & Tourangeau, R.
Year
Abstract

Some researchers have argued that respondents give more extreme answers to questions involving response scales over the telephone than in other modes of data collection, but others have argued that telephone respondents give more positive answers. We conducted a meta-analysis based on 18 experimental comparisons between telephone interviews and another mode of data collection. Our analysis showed that telephone respondents are significantly more likely than respondents in other modes to give extremely positive answers (for example, the highest satisfaction ratings in a customer satisfaction survey) but are not more likely to give extremely negative responses. This tendency to give highly positive ratings appears to be related to the presence of an interviewer, and it may reflect respondents' reluctance to express bad news, a tendency some social psychologists have dubbed the MUM effect. (Author/publisher)

Request publication

3 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
20120353 ST [electronic version only]
Source

Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 75 (2011), No. 2 (Summer), p. 349-365, ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.