Abstract
Two different restraint systems - mandatory harness, airbag plus 20% lap belt usage, airbag, passive three point harness, and torso and knee bar - are analysed for fatality and injury reduction, benefit/cost ratio and cost-effectiveness. The mandatory harness is superior to the others in all comparisons. A major advantage of the mandatory harness is that practically all of the vehicles are stripped .xhae(the.iwther systems irill require 10 years for complete installation.