To pay or not to pay : keuzemogelijkheden in stedelijk gebied.

Author(s)
Reisen, A.A.J. & Hus, J.
Year
Abstract

Notwithstanding the fact that the rate of future growth in mobility is slowing down in the Netherlands, the mobility and car traffic in cities is expected to grow significantly. This article outlines a major dilemma for the urban transport policy: are Dutch cities tending to accommodate the traffic growth in accordance with Dutch national policy, or do they want to limit the growth? In choosing to limit car traffic growth, a well-directed parking policy is probably the most applicable instrument. In two scenarios the effect of parking policy is illustrated. Figures from Tilburg and Venlo show that traffic towards the city centres increases. The major roads are not adequate to handle this growth. Applying an accommodating policy will most likely result in a high toll for local authorities to solve the resulting accessibility and liveability problems. From the present case study, however, we can learn that a more regulating parking policy, which includes higher parking rates and limitation of parking places, has a significant influence on the traffic flows towards the city centre. Even so a regulating parking policy has to be developed in a careful way, in order to reach the desired benefits and to avoid the possible undesired consequences. (Author/publisher)

Request publication

6 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
20031588 c29 ST (In: ST 20031588 [electronic version only])
Source

In: No pay, no queue ? : oplossingen voor bereikbaarheidsproblemen in steden : 30ste Colloquium Vervoersplanologisch Speurwerk CVS : bundeling van bijdragen aan het colloquium gehouden te Antwerpen, 20 en 21 november 2003, deel 3, p. 1281-1300, 12 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.