A pilot study of drivers' judgements about speed limits, safe speeds and average speeds.

Author(s)
Cairney, P.T. & Croft, P.G.
Year
Abstract

With the aim of exploring the factors that underlie drivers' judgements about speed limits and appropriate operating speeds, drivers were presented with photographic sliders of normal traffic scenes and asked to say what they thought the average speed of the traffic would be. Two independent factors were manipulated in the scenes used, a land use factor which included recreational, industrial, commercial and residential environments, and a road configuration factor which included undivided two lane and four lane roads, and divided roads with narrow and wide medians. ANOVA showed that although both factors were significant, the interaction was much larger than the main effects. It was concluded that this technique was a viable means of investigation speed judgements, that the greatest discrepanties between estimated operating speeds and speed limit occurred on four lane undivided roads and divided roads with narrow medians, and that future work should attempt to relate estimated speds with actual speeds measured on-site.

Request publication

3 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
940600 ST [electronic version only]
Source

Vermont South, Victoria, Australian Road Research Board ARRB, 1985, 20 p., 15 ref.; ARRB Internal Report ; AIR 394-9

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.