Priorities of pedestrian protectionùA real-life study of severe injuries and car sources.

Author(s)
Fredriksson, R. Rosen, E. & Kullgren, A.
Year
Abstract

The aim of this study was to aid the optimisation of future, vehicle based, pedestrian injury countermeasures. The German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) database was queried for pedestrians impacted by the front of a passenger car or van. A total of 1030 cases from 1998 to 2008 were studied including 161 severely (AIS3+) injured pedestrians. Considering the severe injuries, the most frequent injury mechanisms were leg-to-front end, head-to-windscreen area, chest-to-bonnet area, and chest-to-windscreen area. For children, a head-to-bonnet area impact was the second most common source of injury. With safety systems targeting these five injury mechanisms, 73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65-1%) of the severely injured pedestrians would be provided protection from all of their vehicle-induced severe injuries. Omitting the windscreen area, this figure is decreased to 44% (CI, 36-3%). Furthermore, 31% of the surviving pedestrians were estimated to sustain a permanent medical impairment at any level. For more severe impairment, head was the dominating body region. The study shows that when developing countermeasures for the windscreen area to mitigate head injuries, attention should be paid to the structural parts of the windscreen area with a special focus on brain injuries. Finally, the incidence and risk of severe injury were derived as functions of impact speed for different body regions and injury sources.

Request publication

6 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
I E157396 /84 /91 / ITRD E157396
Source

Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2010 /11. 42(6) Pp1672-1681 (38 Refs.)

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.