Ruimtelijke ontwikkeling, verkeer, geluidshinder en impact op leefbaarheid : toepassing van een model voor het meten van verkeersleefbaarheid op een aantal casestudies.

Author(s)
Dekoninck, L. Gillis, D. Botteldooren, D. & Lauwers, D.
Year
Abstract

Spatial planning, traffic, noise annoyance and the impact on livability : application of a model for the assessment of traffic livability in a number of case studies. In previous phases of the project, a methodology and a modelling tool were developed for the assessment of the impact of traffic on the livability of the surrounding functions. This model was applied to the case of the city center of Ghent (Belgium). In this report this model is used for the further analysis of some case studies concerning some typical problem situations in the field of traffic noise and traffic livability. Prior to these case studies, some limitations of the current model are discussed. The availability and quality of a number of input data are a first issue, making some parts of the model insufficiently detailed or reliable. A second issue is the level of detail or the quality of some (external) exposure models. Specifically the static character of some data makes it impossible to recalculate the data corresponding to the specific scenario evaluation. As a consequence some effects can't be incorporated in the model to their full extent. Finally the applied annoyance curves are typically derived for the higher exposure levels, in order to detect problem areas. There is little research about the applicability of the curves for lower exposure levels. This may mean that some impacts are underestimated in the model (the perception of changing from low to very low levels may be larger than is shown in these curves). In two case studies the model is applied to some typical problem situations: 1) The impact of internal traffic organization within a quarter: in the scenarios the strongest effect hails from a changing traffic behaviour, aiming at shorter trip distances and reduced use of the car. This is explained by a double effect: on one hand the total amount of car traffic (and its related impacts) is reduced, and on the other hand people’s exposure to this traffic is reduced. 2) The impact of buildings along a road with busy traffic: these building are a typical source of annoyance for its inhabitants, but at the same time offer a shielding effect towards the houses which are situated behind them. From the model evaluation two effects can be distinguished. Indeed the houses along the road have a positive shielding effect, but on the other hand the inhabitants of the houses are exposed to very high levels of annoyance. In the case-study the positive effect compensates for the second effect. Especially if the negative effect can be mitigated by giving these houses an adapted function (less sensitive functions) or an adapted architecture, the application of building as a shield towards living areas offers perspectives. (Author/publisher)

Publication

Library number
20131892 ST [electronic version only]
Source

Diepenbeek, Steunpunt Mobiliteit & Openbare Werken, Spoor Verkeersveiligheid, Onderzoekslijn Duurzame mobiliteit, 2012, 46 p., 22 ref.; Rapportnummer RA-MOW-2011-037

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.