Sensitivity in the operation of conventional and alternatively fuelled Public Service Vehicles on Merseyside.

Author(s)
Finnegan, S. Tickell, R.G. & Booth, K.
Year
Abstract

This paper compares the sensitivity in the operation of conventional and alternatively fuelled Public Service Vehicles (PSVs) in operation across Merseyside. Each fuel is compared on a life cycle assessment (LCA) basis, with the addition of landfill gas (LFG) as a viable alternative. On a complete life cycle basis, LFG powered vehicles compare favourably with gas-powered vehicles and generally cause less pollution than the liquid-fuel powered vehicles, with electric vehicles generally producing the least pollution overall. In the majority of cases, the sensitivity analysis has revealed that the most significant stage in the life cycles of each fuel and vehicle is the end-use (fuel combustion) stage. In some cases this stage alone contributes to 90% of the total life cycle emissions. Daily and annual changes in vehicle operation have a large influence on the amount of pollution released into the atmosphere. For the covering abstract see ITRD E128680.

Request publication

15 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
C 36225 (In: C 36168 [electronic version only]) /91 /15 / ITRD E128737
Source

In: Urban Transport X : urban transport and the environment in the 21st century : proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Urban Transport and The Environment in the 21st Century, Dresden, Germany, 2004, p. 583-592, 16 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.