This paper focuses on assessing and applying the Federal Aviation Administration's System for assessing Aviation's Global Emissions (SAGE), Version 1.5, to evaluate global aircraft fuel consumption and emissions. The model is capable of computing fuel burn and emissions on a flight-by-flight, fleet and global basis. Here, a parametric study was conducted to rank-order the effects that the modeling uncertainties had on estimates of fuel burn and emissions. Statistical methods were applied to analyze both the random and systematic errors of the model. Also, applying the model to a sample policy analysis case allowed an examination of more stringent engine certification standards for mitigating aviation emissions. Uncertainties of the model were carefully accounted for in the fuel burn and emissions scenarios of the policy options. Results show that for some applications, SAGE may be used to resolve small differences in fleet emissions performance. Although the absolute uncertainty in flight-by-flight NOx predictions from the model are of the order of 40%, results show that it is well within the current capabilities of the model to distinguish between the fleet average NOx emissions associated with the typical NOx stringency options considered in policy analyses. (A) Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
Abstract