Thoracic injury criterion for frontal crash applicable to all restraint systems.

Author(s)
Petitjean, A. Baudrit, P. & Trosseille, X.
Year
Abstract

For several years now, car manufacturers have made significant efforts in the field of thoracic protection. After first limiting the forces in the shoulder belt to 6 kN, these forces are now usually limited to 4 kN, with airbags intentionally designed to absorb the surplus of energy. If this technology is rewarded by a considerable improvement in safety on the road, it remains penalized by the usual biomechanical criteria, when calculated on the Hybrid III and if applied to all restraint systems. To remedy this problem, a new criterion, valid in all the current restraint configurations (belt, airbag only or airbag and belt) is proposed. It is based on the measurement of the shoulder belt forces and of the central deflection and consequently is directly applicable to the current dummy model (Hybrid 111). The use of shoulder belt forces allows the separation of the belt and airbag contributions to the deflection. A weighted criterion is calculated from these deflections, taking into account the different risks associated with a belt and an airbag for the same deflection. This new criterion was developed using 65 simulations on the LAB human model and validated by means of 48 sled tests from the literature, consisting of Hybrid 111 dummy and PMHS tests performed in similar configurations. This paper describes the logic behind the development of the criterion and gives all the parameters used as well as the elements of validation. (Author/publisher)

Request publication

4 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
20042032 o ST (In: ST 20042032 [electronic version only])
Source

In: Stapp Car Crash Journal Volume 47 : papers presented at the 47th Stapp Car Crash Conference, San Diego, California, USA, October 2003, Technical Paper 2003-22-0015, p. 323-348, 23 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.