TORT VERSUS NO-FAULT: COMPENSATION AND INJURY PREVENTION.

Author(s)
O'Connell, J.
Year
Abstract

THE TORT SYSTEM, AS A MEANS OF COMPENSATING THE VICTIMS OF INJURY, NO LONGER FULFILLS THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED. THE ATTEMPT TO ACHIEVE A FAIR AND RATIONAL METHOD OF COMPENSATION, ESPECIALLY IN THE AREAS OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY, HAS BEEN DISPLACED BY A FORM OF LITIGATION LOTTERY WHICH PERMITS ATTORNEY'S FEES TO DIVERT GREAT AMOUNTS OF MONEY FROM VICTIMS IN NEED. A REFORM OF THIS SYSTEM IS MUCH IN NEED AND LONG OVERDUE. FOLLOWING A DISCUSSION OF THESE AND OTHER PROBLEMS WITH THE TORT SYSTEM, THIS PAPER WILL PRESENT A METHOD FOR ENSURING THE PROMPT SETTLEMENT OF MOST PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS THROUGH PAYMENT OF THE VICTIM'S NET ECONOMIC LOSSES. THE PARALLELS TO NO-FAULT AUTO INSURANCE AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION ARE EXAMINED AND ATTENTION IS GIVEN TO THE LIKELY IMPACT OF THIS PROPOSAL ON THE CONDUCT OF POTENTIAL INJURERS AND VICTIMS.(Author/publisher).

Request publication

2 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
I 801666 /83 / IRRD 801666
Source

Accident Analysis & Prevention. 1987 /02. 19(1) Pp63-71 (24 Refs.)

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.