Urban and rural variation in walking patterns and pedestrian crashes.

Author(s)
Zhu, M. Cummings, P. Chu, H. & Xiang, H.
Year
Abstract

Compared with rural areas, the aRR for a pedestrianvehicle collision, based on resident years, was 2.0 (95% CI 1.7 to 2.3) in small urban areas, 1.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.3) in mid-size urban areas, and 4.2 (95% CI 3.6 to 4.8) in the large urban area. The aRR based on miles walked was 2.3 (95% CI 1.6 to 3.2) in small urban areas, 2.0 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.9) in mid-size urbanareas, and 1.9 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.7) in the large area. The aRR for a fatalpedestrian injury, based on miles walked, was 2.1 (95% CI 1.3 to 3.6) in small urban areas, 1.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.9) in mid-size urban areas, and 0.9 (95% CI 0.6 to 1.3) in the large urban area. The rate of pedestrian crashes and injuries in small and mid-size urban areas was twice that in ruralareas, whether based on resident years or miles walked. The high rate of pedestrian crashes in the large urban area based on resident years could be partly explained by the fact that residents in such areas walk about twice as much as residents in rural areas. The rate of fatal pedestrian injury based on miles walked was similar in the large urban area and rural areas. (Author/publisher).

Request publication

8 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
I E140731 /72 / ITRD E140731
Source

Injury Prevention. 2008 /12. Pp377-380

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.