Using the Rear End Accident Model and Countermeasure Simulation REAMACS model to compare the effectiveness of alternative rear end collision warning algorithms.

Author(s)
Farber, E.
Year
Abstract

In this paper the results are presented of an analytical study of alternative rear end collision-avoidance algorithms using the Ford `Rear End Accident Model And Countermeasure Simulation' (REAMACS). REAMACS models rear end collision situations in freeway traffic, and estimates the benefits of collision avoidance systems. Previously reported applications of the model indicate that rear end crash warning system has the potential for a 60% reduction of the number of serious rear end crashes in freeway traffic. The present study confirmed and extended those findings to a broader range of conditions. Two different collision warning algorithms were analyzed: (1) a Closing Rate Algorithm (CRA) which provides a warning only if the following vehicle has a positive closing rate with the lead vehicle; and (2) a Stopping Distance Algorithm (SDA) which provides advanced warning of a potential hazard. The SDA was more effective than the CRA, with effectiveness rates approaching 100%, but gave 440 to 1100 times more warnings than the CRA. Whether or not drivers would comply with such warnings is an issue. (A)

Request publication

10 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
C 9232 (In: C 9195 [electronic version only]) /91 / IRRD 894885
Source

In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles ESV, Munich, Germany, May 23-26, 1994, Volume 1, Paper 94-s3-o-03, p. 417-427, 4 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.