Visual testing for readiness to driver after stroke : a multicenter study.

Author(s)
Korner-Bitensky, N. Mazer, B.L. Sofer, S. Gelina, I. Meyer, M.B. Morrison, C. Tritch, L. Roelke, M.A. & White, M.
Year
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of a visual-perception assessment tool, the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test, to predict on-road driving outcome in subjects with stroke. This was a retrospective study of 169 individuals with stroke who completed visual-perception testing and an on-road driving evaluation. Driving evaluators from six evaluation sites in Canada and the United States participated. Visual-perception was assessed using the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test. Scores range from 0 to 36, with a higher score indicating better visual perception. A structured on-road driving evaluation was performed to determine fitness to drive. Based on driving behaviours, a pass or fail outcome was determined by the examiner. The results indicated that, using a score on the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test of less or equal than 30 to indicate poor visual perception and more than 30 to indicate good visual perception, the positive predictive value of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test in identifying who would fail the on-road test was 60.9% (n = 67/110). The corresponding negative predictive value was 64.2% (n = 102/159). Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed that older age, low Motor-Free Visual Perception Test scores and a right hemisphere lesion contributed significantly to identifying those who failed the on-road test. The predictive validity of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test is not sufficiently high to warrant its use as the sole screening tool in identifying those who are unfit to undergo an on-road evaluation. (A)

Request publication

2 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
20010221 ST [electronic version only]
Source

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 79 (2000), No. 3 (May/June), p. 253-259, 12 ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.