Warrants for midblock pedestrian crossings. An examination of fuel consumption and delay costs.

Author(s)
Pretty, R.L. & Dunn, R.C.M.
Year
Abstract

Warrants for midblock pedestrian crossings have been reconsidered theoretically. If excess fuel consumption is a principal criterion.Zebra crossings should be eliminated. A hierarchy of crossing would the be 1. refuges2. Pelican crossings; and 3. grade separation.Pelican crossings which operate in Perth are shown to cause less delay and less likelihood of stopping for motor vehicles. They do not change pedestrian delay.Thus they perform better than pedestrian operated signals. New warrants are suggested.

Request publication

6 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
B 27612 (In: B 27610 [electronic version only]) /85 /96 / IRRD 289438
Source

In: Proceedings of the 13th ARRB- 5th REAAA Combined Conference, Adelade, August 25- 29, 1986. Traffic. Vol13- Proceedings- part 7, p.14- 25, 17ref.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.