Why the issue is loss reduction rather than only crash prevention. Paper presented at the Automotive Engineering Congress, Detroit, Michigan, January 12-16, 1970.

Author(s)
Haddon, W.
Year
Abstract

Traditional emphasis only on crash prevention ignores major opportunities for reducing losses to damaged people and property. A standard method is needed for rating vehicles, occupant protection considering limits set by physics and body force tolerances. The use of structural damage for crash energy absorption, particularly at 5 to 20 m-p.h., is archaic in comparison with aircraft strut design. It is predicted that the present, structural-damage approach to low speed energy absorption will soon become publicity unacceptable.

Request publication

11 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Publication

Library number
A 4582 fo IRRD 58194
Source

New York, Society for Automotive Engineers SAE, 1970, 16 p., ref.; SAE publ., 700196.

Our collection

This publication is one of our other publications, and part of our extensive collection of road safety literature, that also includes the SWOV publications.