Child passenger safety and the immunity fallacy: Why what we are doing is not working.

Auteur(s)
Will, K.E.
Jaar
Samenvatting

Motivating parents to take certain safety precautions when traveling with their children remains an elusive challenge for advocates, as caregiver naivet_ contributes to poor parental participation in safety-seat checks, low booster-seat use, poor adherence to rear-seat positioning, and intermittent safety-belt use. Because of inherent human biases and unfortunate characteristics of vehicle travel, it is argued that most caregivers possess an immunity fallacy, or a reduced perception of risk for motor vehicle injury to their children. Consequently, traditionally designed child passenger safety campaigns, which are primarily informational, fail to have an impact on most parents. Rather, for maximum behavioral success, injury prevention messages must shock and surprise parents into paying attention to something they would normally dismiss as unimportant. (A) "Reprinted with permission from Elsevier".

Publicatie aanvragen

14 + 3 =
Los deze eenvoudige rekenoefening op en voer het resultaat in. Bijvoorbeeld: voor 1+3, voer 4 in.

Publicatie

Bibliotheeknummer
I E126865 /83 /91 / ITRD E126865
Uitgave

Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2005 /09. 37(5) Pp947-55 (96 Refs.)

Onze collectie

Deze publicatie behoort tot de overige publicaties die we naast de SWOV-publicaties in onze collectie hebben.