A comparison of three methods for evaluating traffic signs. Paper prepared for the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board HRB, Washington, D.C., January 1974.

Auteur(s)
Dewar, R.E. & Ells, J.G.
Jaar
Samenvatting

Three different experiments were conducted for the purpose of comparing three methods of evaluating traffic sign perception while driving an automobile. The results indicated the three measurements of performance to be closely related. Sign were classified at a greater distance than they were identified. Performance was better on symbolic than on verbal signs, and it was better on warning than on regulatory signs.

Publicatie aanvragen

1 + 19 =
Los deze eenvoudige rekenoefening op en voer het resultaat in. Bijvoorbeeld: voor 1+3, voer 4 in.

Publicatie

Bibliotheeknummer
B 3854 /73/
Uitgave

Alberta (Canada), University of Calgary, 1974, 25 p., graph., tab., ref.

Onze collectie

Deze publicatie behoort tot de overige publicaties die we naast de SWOV-publicaties in onze collectie hebben.