Detecting moderators with meta-analysis : an evaluation and comparison of techniques.

Auteur(s)
Sagie, A. & Koslowsky, M.
Jaar
Samenvatting

The present study evaluated accuracy levels of seven techniques for ascertaining, after a meta-analysis, whether moderators are present or not: (a) SH-75% rule for uncorrected r, (b) SH-75% rule for corrected r, (c) SH-95% for uncorrected r, (d) SH-95% for corrected r, (e) the Q statistic, (f) inclusion of 0 in the credibility interval around the corrected r, and (g) the size of the interval. Using Monte Carlo data which were defined by various parameters including sample based artifacts, comparisons of Type I and power determinations were generated. Limitations and some practical implications for the finding are discussed.

Publicatie aanvragen

3 + 3 =
Los deze eenvoudige rekenoefening op en voer het resultaat in. Bijvoorbeeld: voor 1+3, voer 4 in.

Publicatie

Bibliotheeknummer
932183 ST [electronic version only]
Uitgave

Personnel Psychology, Vol. 46 (1993), No. 3 (Fall), p. 629-640, 24 ref.

Onze collectie

Deze publicatie behoort tot de overige publicaties die we naast de SWOV-publicaties in onze collectie hebben.