Improved understanding of the multidimensional nature of disadvantage is leading to development of a wider range of measurement variables than traditional income poverty lines. One of the variables now commonly included in indices of disadvantage, is households that do not have a car. This paper questions the logic of including not having a car as an indicator of disadvantage. It argues that the inclusion of this variable distorts the true picture of the distribution of advantage and disadvantage in wealthy nations such as the UK and Australia. The purpose of this paper is not to undermine the development of multidimensional measures of disadvantage, but rather to open debate and contribute to the development of more accurate measures of disadvantage. An examination of such measures of disadvantage can also help to illuminate the role of transport in addressing disadvantage and delivering economic prosperity. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E217541.
Samenvatting