Helmets reduce the frequency and severity of head and brain injuries over a range of impact severities broader than those covered by the impact attenuation standards. Our goal was to document the impact attenuation performance of common helmet types over a wide range of impact speeds. Sixty-five drop tests were performed against the side of 10 different helmets onto a flat anvil at impact speeds of 0.9-0.1 m/s (energy = 2-60 J; equivalent drop heights of 0.04-.2 m). Three non-approved beanie helmets performed poorly, with the worst helmet reaching a peak headform acceleration of 852g at 29 J. Three full-face and one open-face helmet responded similarly from about 100g at 30 J to between 292g and 344g at 256-60 J. Three shorty style helmets responded like the full-face helmets up to 150 J, above which varying degrees of foam densification appeared to occur. Impact restitution values varied from 0.19 to 0.46. A three-parameter model successfully captured the plateau and densification responses exhibited by the various helmets (R2 = 0.95-.99). Helmet responses varied with foam thickness, foam material and possibly shell material, with the largest response differences consistent with either the presence/absence of a foam liner or the densification of the foam liner._(A) Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
Samenvatting