This paper describes the monitoring of the conversion of two pedestrian-operated signals to operate as pelican crossings at which double the number of legal crossing opportunities per hour was provided. The crossings were located in two of Sydney's traditional inner suburban shopping strips. Monitoring was undertaken by kerbside interviews with pedestrians to determine their understanding and perceptions; manual observation of pedestrian movements and characteristics; kerbside interviews with drivers near the two pelican crossing sites; and video-recording of the whole section of road from an elevated camera position. Taken as a whole, there was a noticeable and distinct shift to more conforming behaviour at both of the sites. The percentage of pedestrians who chose to cross at the crossings, rather than nearby, increased at both sites. These increases were statistically significant. The percentage of pedestrians who commenced crossing against the steady red DON'T WALK also reduced noticeably at both sites. Almost all drivers were aware of the changes and very much welcomed them because they reduced unnecessary delay and frustration. Drivers had a working understanding of the meaning of the flashing yellow display although it was clear from their behaviour that they were slightly hesitant. There were no adverse effects on vehicular traffic flow. Some pedestrians, however, were concerned that the traffic `wouldn't stop'. (A)
Samenvatting