The perceived legitimacy of intervention : a key feature for road safety.

Auteur(s)
McKenna, F.P.
Jaar
Samenvatting

It is argued that sufficient is known about the broad causal factors underlying crashes to prompt action. The challenge for society has been and remains whether we are prepared to take action to reduce casualties. There are key philosophical arguments and psychological processes at the heart of this debate. Given that these arguments and these psychological processes operate as the gatekeepers to action, it is argued that they merit more attention than they have received. The paper provides an examination of the "harm principle", which has been employed to limit paternalistic interventions. More generally, the perceived legitimacy of intervention is examined, and the specific case of speeding is considered.

Publicatie

Bibliotheeknummer
C 42637 (In: C 39405 [electronic version only])
Uitgave

In: Improving traffic safety culture in the United States : the journey forward, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, 2007, p. 165-176

Onze collectie

Deze publicatie behoort tot de overige publicaties die we naast de SWOV-publicaties in onze collectie hebben.