Reporting and forgetting accidents and other driving events.

Auteur(s)
Chapman, P. & Underwood, G.
Jaar
Samenvatting

Self-reports are used for many studies of individual accident liability and assessments of countermeasures, but there is good evidence that they are rarely veridical. This paper presents a study which explored several variables relevant to recall, especially for near-accidents. The severity of individual incidents was examined, together with possible driver culpability. The potential effects of driving experience were also investigated. Thus the study compared two methods of obtaining self-reports, rather than comparing memories with objective data. 77 male and 71 female drivers were tested, consisting of 90 young novices, 21 older novices, and 37 older experienced drivers. It was found that the change in reporting style produced by the tests affected descriptions of near-accidents very differently from estimates of numbers of journeys, distance travelled, and time spent driving. Many drivers seemed to forget incidents in which they had been involved.

Publicatie aanvragen

6 + 10 =
Los deze eenvoudige rekenoefening op en voer het resultaat in. Bijvoorbeeld: voor 1+3, voer 4 in.

Publicatie

Bibliotheeknummer
C 11339 (In: C 11320 [electronic version only]) /83 / IRRD 899075
Uitgave

In: Behavioural research in road safety VII : proceedings of a seminar at Esher Place, 14-16 April 1997, p. 120-129, 14 ref.

Onze collectie

Deze publicatie behoort tot de overige publicaties die we naast de SWOV-publicaties in onze collectie hebben.