Speed enforcement programmes in France and Queensland : first elements for a systematic comparison.

Auteur(s)
Carnis, L. Rakotonirainy, A. & Fleiter, J.J.
Jaar
Samenvatting

Speeding is one of the main contributing factors to road crashes. The use of Automated Speed Enforcement programmes (ASE) appears to be one of the most promising interventions to change driver behaviour and reduce road trauma. International experience has shown clear benefits from such programmes. This paper compares the approaches taken by the French and Queensland Governments regarding implementation and management of ASE. The first section summarises the historical background of both programmes and highlights the role of political leaders in the road safety arena. The second section addresses organisational dimensions, including how the programmes are deployed and operated. Finally, we compare the performance outcomes of each system. We conclude by highlighting that there appears to be no single best way to implement speed enforcement measures in a whole-of-jurisdiction approach. Rather, lessons from the deployment of individual enforcement methods and related outcomes internationally, together with considerations of political and organizational factors, should inform speed management strategy choices. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E217329.

Publicatie aanvragen

11 + 1 =
Los deze eenvoudige rekenoefening op en voer het resultaat in. Bijvoorbeeld: voor 1+3, voer 4 in.

Publicatie

Bibliotheeknummer
C 45954 (In: C 45943 CD-ROM) /83 / ITRD E217281
Uitgave

In: High Risk Road Users 2008 : Proceedings of the Australasian College of Road Safety and the Travelsafe Committee of the Queensland Parliament National Conference on High Risk Road Users : Motivating Behaviour Change : What Works and What Doesn't Work ?, Brisbane, Australia, 18-19 September 2008, 14 p., 31 ref.

Onze collectie

Deze publicatie behoort tot de overige publicaties die we naast de SWOV-publicaties in onze collectie hebben.