Traffic violations versus driving errors of older adults : informing clinical practice.

Auteur(s)
Classen, S. Shechtman, O. Awadzi, K.D. Joo, Y. & Lanford, D.N.
Jaar
Samenvatting

Certain driving errors are predictive of crashes, but whether the type of errors evaluated during on-road assessment is similar to traffic violations that are associated with crashes is unknown. Using the crash data of 5,345 older drivers and expert reviewers, the authors constructed a violation-to-error classification based on rater agreement. They examined the effects of predictor variables on crash-related injuries by risk probability using logistic regression. Drivers' mean age was 76.08 (standard deviation = 7.10); 45.7% were women. Of drivers, 44.6% sustained crash-related injuries, and female drivers had a higher injury probability (44%) than male drivers (29%). Lane maintenance, yielding, and gap acceptance errors predicted crash-related injuries with almost 50% probability; speed regulation (34%), vehicle positioning (25%), and adjustment-to-stimuli (21%) errors predicted crash-related injuries to a lesser degree. The authors suggest injury prevention strategies for clinicians and researchers to consider for older drivers, especially older women. (Author/publisher)

Publicatie

Bibliotheeknummer
20100757 ST [electronic version only]
Uitgave

American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 64 (2010), No. 2 (March-April), p. 233-241, ref.

Onze collectie

Deze publicatie behoort tot de overige publicaties die we naast de SWOV-publicaties in onze collectie hebben.