This paper considers the nature, status and direction of `ecopsychology' and its relationship to psychology and environmental psychology. A brief historical perspective is provided, along with an examination of what is currently encompassed by the term, and by whom, with a particular focus on the writings of Roszak (1992). An attempt is made to separate social movements from changing social representation and to distinguish psychological content and focus from ideology, individual and societal change agenda, and popular culture. The paper gives particular attention to the nature and role of `self' as ultimate target and agent of meaningful change, both in the context of conservation initiatives and with respect to therapeutic encounter/intervention. The nature and expression of ecopsychology in Australia are also briefly explored, as are the representation posed and discussed in the paper. What does ecopsychology offer psychology ? What does psychology have to offer ecopsychology ? Can environmental psychology encompass ecopsychology ? The prognosis for environmental psychology and the greening of psychology is explored. (A)
Samenvatting